Transformation Trade-offs

Jul 27, 2022

Much has been written about the need for enterprise transformation and the obstacles that leaders invariably face. Many look for the One Best Way (a la Frederick Taylor) to achieve transformations, but the awkward truth is that leaders always have to make trade-offs along the way. Organizational transformation is, therefore, as much an art (or a craft) as a science. Studying the craft of practitioners – leaders in the trenches doing the work – informs the science, which in turn, hopefully, aids organizations as they change. In this article, we review some critical decisions leaders must make and discuss factors we think worthy of their consideration.

Leaders must determine how far and fast they need to go when envisioning a transformation. Many factors influence the level of ambition, including the degree of competitive pressure in the industry, the company’s financial performance, and the future outlook for operating expenses and customer demand. If the motivation is to improve volume and profitability for an existing business model, the “transformation” is really just an ongoing business modernization. A higher ambition level is required if the objective is to develop more scalable and capital-efficient business models, which may require changes in culture, structure, and strategy. Our focus here is primarily on the latter scenario.

Going further and faster can lead to improved competitive advantage, but in enterprise transformation, as in all things in life, there is no free lunch. The strategy of an enterprise is often multi-faceted, with a broad portfolio of initiatives. Allocating more resources for some might mean allocating less for others. The executive team and the board must consider whether to cut expenditures elsewhere, use external financing, or live with lower operating margins until the transformation pays off.

Investor Relations must be considered in some cases – how does one explain the effort to shareholders and prospective shareholders? New business models, for instance, may directly impact analysts’ assessments of public companies, so crafting the story must be done with care.

The technological aspects of a transformation also require several trade-offs, including :

  • improving legacy systems versus deploying new applications
  • leading-edge technologies versus “proven” approaches
  • building versus buying for new applications

Reducing the time to deployment is often critical, but pure off-the-shelf solutions may not yield sufficient competitive advantage. Developing custom software may not be enough either, especially when the data accumulated in an enterprise won’t be there overnight.

In a fascinating podcast interview with DecoderRent the Runway’s CEO, Jennifer Hyman, described how gathering data from millions of fashion rentals allowed the company to reuse garments more times, an achievement critical to profitability in a subscription-based business model. It was only possible because millions of transactions had occurred, with data that could be analyzed. The data aspect of enterprise transformation may be custom enough that it must be built – or earned – for that enterprise specifically.

Enterprises are socio-technical systems. Their technology components are inherently linked to the people who develop, deploy, and interact with them. Transformations, therefore, entail many people-related trade-offs, including:

  • developing people versus hiring new talent
  • making innovation everyone’s business versus using special innovation teams (e.g., “black belts”)
  • productivity improvement versus wholesale automation
  • changing the culture versus adapting to the people you have
  • long-term employment versus short-term and loosely coupled relationship

The traditional Lean Enterprise school regards innovation as everyone’s business and technology as means of empowering people rather than replacing them. It expects leaders to focus on developing people over the long term. Ideally, the time horizon for developing people aligns with the strategy pursued by the enterprise. Such an approach no longer works as well when an industry is disrupted via a new technology platform that is much less people-intensive. This is the dilemma faced by traditional banks as they encounter FinTech startups.

At the same time, a McKinsey report released on July 13, 2022, cited lack of career development and advancement as the top reason for employees leaving. There is little doubt that leadership teams that are too cautious risk losing A-players in critical areas such as Artificial Intelligence.

Enterprises have long used M&A as a tool for remaking themselves, and over the last few years, corporate venturing has also emerged as a trend. The motivation for the latter is usually not purely financial; it is also to build a closer relationship with startups and get early access to their technologies. A complementary approach is to open more internal R&D centers and incubators, seeking to develop new startups from within.

Before Covid-19, enterprises focused their talent recruitment and venture investing efforts on major technology hubs or in proximity to existing office locations. The pandemic changed the landscape, however. Talent is now more widely dispersed, and hybrid work is here to stay. Leaders must strike a balance between geographical focus and working with talent where they are.

On July 21, 2022, Andreessen Horowitz announced that it would no longer regard its Sand Hill Road office in Menlo Park, California, as its headquarters. Instead, they declared that their headquarters was “in the cloud” and that they would open local offices in Miami, New York, and Santa Monica. Co-founder Ben Horowitz explained in a blog post that the pandemic had weakened the (centralizing) Silicon Valley network defect. In other words, the response to the decentralization of the talent base was the decentralization of office locations. Even here, however, leaders face a trade-off – how many new offices should they open? Not all industries are as mobile as software, and new offices may be costly.

No matter the geographical location of the workforce, if the transformation is to feel meaningful to people, leaders must involve them. Leaders must decide on the degree of employee involvement and on what decision rights they wish to grant. If employees have too much decision-making power, there is a risk that the transformation is either too timid or that it becomes reckless. Creativity is desirable, but so is organizational alignment.

People need a sense of purpose and context in their work. When an organization undergoes a profound change, its mission may change, and the desired mindset and behaviors of employees might also need to change. People have a certain degree of flexibility concerning their purpose, mindset, and behaviors, but it is finite. The more drastic the desired changes in an organization’s culture, the more likely leaders will have to go outside for the people they need to replace those who are no longer compatible.

As organizations transform on the inside, they must also do so on the outside. The brand that represents the organization today may become unsuitable, in which case a rebranding effort may need to be part of the transformation. It is not uncommon for a large enterprise to develop portfolios of brands as they grow, either organically or through acquisitions.

Finally, we would be remiss if we did not mention that in large organizations, the answer to each of the dilemmas discussed here may legitimately be different for different parts of the enterprise. Even within one company, therefore, there may not be One Best Way. Instead, leadership teams must often grapple with a set of fluid considerations that change over time.

You may also like:

Computing without Boundaries

Computing without Boundaries

From the earliest flight simulators to the computers now embedded in everything from toasters to cars, we have tried to transport ourselves into a digital space or attempted to bring a digital space into our physical environment. Until now, it has been either-or for...

2024 Challenges: AI, Turmoil, Talent

2024 Challenges: AI, Turmoil, Talent

CEOs face significant challenges this year, with a turbulent macro environment and virtually every industry holding rich opportunities for disruptive innovation. Based on our research and interaction with Global 2000 leaders and investors, we believe the following...

Remembering Sergei Mitrofanov

Remembering Sergei Mitrofanov

Early in the morning on August 4, I learned that our CMO and my dear friend and mentor, Sergei Mitrofanov had passed away suddenly the day before. The news came as a shock to friends, family, and colleagues around the world. Sergei was a vigorous man in his...

Joseph Battir interviews Frode Odegard

Joseph Battir interviews Frode Odegard

Dr. Joseph Battir  of the Energy Transition Solutions podcast at the Oil and Gas Global Network interviewed Frode Odegard, CEO and Founder of the Post-Industrial Institute, about the post-industrial transition, the need for new management thinking, and the...

The New World Disorder

The New World Disorder

We should embrace the ideas and values that made the West great and that helped people prosper around the world. Our freedom is our most precious tool for addressing the problems and opportunities that lie before us. Two events took place in 1989 that signaled two...

Russell Haworth interviews Frode Odegard

Russell Haworth interviews Frode Odegard

Thoughts from the Big Chair is a new podcast hosted by Russell Haworth. He interviews  senior business leaders with unique perspectives on the opportunities and challenges of digital transformation. It covers a broad range of topics from strategy to technology to...

Leading the Unwilling

Leading the Unwilling

In the emerging post-industrial work landscape, how can leaders persuade people to stay and pursue the organization's goals?  Before the pandemic arrived, the relationship between firms and people had become much more loosely coupled. Half of millennials in the United...

Top ten CEO worries for 2022

Top ten CEO worries for 2022

2022 will be another tumultuous year, by all accounts. A just-released survey by management consulting firm Alix Partners of 3,000 executives reveals that 72% are afraid of losing their jobs in 2022, and 94% predict significant change in their business models. Here...

Transformation Obstacles

Transformation Obstacles

Most enterprises are undergoing a "digital transformation." There is a widespread realization that improving operational efficiency and new adding offerings will not be enough. Where to go from there is not so obvious. Enterprise transformation is a strategic...

The Pre-Post Pandemic

The Pre-Post Pandemic

As we eagerly wave goodbye to 2021, we are two years from the initial reports of the Covid-19 virus. With the arrival of the new Omicron variant, we see new restrictions enacted worldwide. Again. These have been two difficult years, but we have gradually learned to...